Top of page. I aim for "special."
To me, the most fascinating question in science and spirituality, excellent new article. http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20170...uantum-physics
Quantum consciousness" is widely derided as mystical woo, but it just will not go away.

THIS IS WHERE IT ALL GETS VERY MEANINGFUL
John Wheeler, and this "delayed choice" experiment was performed in the following decade.....It turns out that, just as Bohr confidently predicted, it makes no difference whether we delay the measurement or not .....
OUR BRAINS USE ELECTRONS AND PHOSPHATE WITHIN MICROTUBLES THAT "SHOULD" REQUIRE AN OBSERVER TO COLLAPSE TO PARTICLES, BUT WHO IS OBSERVING WHAT IS IN THE BRAIN?

The article is a brilliant survey of the big questions.
I can't get around the fact that it seems that our universe is set up specifically for consciousness, and the only "observer" as to what is inside our brains might well be a soul that is independent of our biochemical selves. That or it's a higher power. Wedding science and religion, God.
That's just me. I've posted before on general idea, and always love the responses.
To me, the most fascinating question in science and spirituality, excellent new article. http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20170...uantum-physics
Quantum consciousness" is widely derided as mystical woo, but it just will not go away.

Perhaps the most renowned of its mysteries is the fact that the outcome of a quantum experiment can change depending on whether or not we choose to measure some property of the particles involved.
When this "observer effect" was first noticed by the early pioneers of quantum theory, they were deeply troubled. It seemed to undermine the basic assumption behind all science: that there is an objective world out there, irrespective of us. If the way the world behaves depends on how – or if – we look at it, what can "reality" really mean?
THIS IS WHERE IT ALL GETS VERY MEANINGFUL
John Wheeler, and this "delayed choice" experiment was performed in the following decade.....It turns out that, just as Bohr confidently predicted, it makes no difference whether we delay the measurement or not .....
It is as if nature "knows" not just if we are looking, but if we are planning to look.

The article is a brilliant survey of the big questions.
I can't get around the fact that it seems that our universe is set up specifically for consciousness, and the only "observer" as to what is inside our brains might well be a soul that is independent of our biochemical selves. That or it's a higher power. Wedding science and religion, God.
That's just me. I've posted before on general idea, and always love the responses.
Comment